Analysis of a scientific data review

 

Click to access 2020.03.25.20043745v1.full.pdf

“We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to March 24, 2020. Data were extracted by two independent authors in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We synthesised a narrative from eligible studies and conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to calculate pooled prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). ”

  • systematically searched electronic databases
  • Data were extracted
  • accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines
  • modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
  • synthesised a narrative from eligible studies
  • conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model
  • calculate pooled prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals

 

systematically searched electronic databases

Preferred Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines

Click to access bmj.g7647.full.pdf

 

Click to access fixed+random.pdf

 

 

enlightenment

Written by logicscience1

Husband, father, brother, spiritual philosopher, techno leader, drum n bass DJ, long distance runner and sometimes human.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: